Carrier Battles for Guadalcanal Forum Index

Carrier Battles for Guadalcanal


 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

[Done] Early Year CAP Needs Improvement (v1.8)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Carrier Battles for Guadalcanal Forum Index -> Topics -> New Features
Previous topic :: Next topic  
Author Message
USS Archerfish
Beta-testing

Offline

Joined: 16 Mar 2017
Posts: 457

PostPosted: Sun 9 Apr - 07:17 (2017)    Post subject: [Done] Early Year CAP Needs Improvement (v1.8) Reply with quote

Ok Bladerunner


I've played the game some more and I still think the early year game CAPs are under performing. One example I had 4 VAls and 3 B5N with no fighter escort get through 7 F4F CAP with no damage.  It just doesn't seem right. The F4F CAP needs to be improved, especially when in coming planes have no fighter escorts. 


Back to top
Publicité






PostPosted: Sun 9 Apr - 07:17 (2017)    Post subject: Publicité

PublicitéSupprimer les publicités ?
Back to top
Bladerunner
Administrateur

Offline

Joined: 25 Jan 2016
Posts: 802
Localisation: France

PostPosted: Tue 11 Apr - 07:17 (2017)    Post subject: [Done] Early Year CAP Needs Improvement (v1.8) Reply with quote

Either very bad luck or a submarine bug
Let me investigate


Back to top
Bladerunner
Administrateur

Offline

Joined: 25 Jan 2016
Posts: 802
Localisation: France

PostPosted: Tue 11 Apr - 07:38 (2017)    Post subject: [Done] Early Year CAP Needs Improvement (v1.8) Reply with quote

Good catch !


There were some discrepancies between the combat table and the code for the +1 and +2 column which may explain some the missing results with F4F
Also optimised the aligment of defending cAP against attacking bomber stacks


Will be fixed for the 1.8


Back to top
currymutton
Beta-testing

Offline

Joined: 27 May 2016
Posts: 552

PostPosted: Wed 12 Apr - 10:29 (2017)    Post subject: [Done] Early Year CAP Needs Improvement (v1.8) Reply with quote

Test with OpKe find that 3 out of 5 times F4F are not effective even with numeric superority....humm...
Bladerunner wrote:

Good catch !


There were some discrepancies between the combat table and the code for the +1 and +2 column which may explain some the missing results with F4F
Also optimised the aligment of defending cAP against attacking bomber stacks


Will be fixed for the 1.8


Back to top
USS Archerfish
Beta-testing

Offline

Joined: 16 Mar 2017
Posts: 457

PostPosted: Wed 12 Apr - 10:37 (2017)    Post subject: [Done] Early Year CAP Needs Improvement (v1.8) Reply with quote

Well I'm glad to know it was a bug and that it can be fixed. So is it just limited to the to the F4F?  It seems the other planes are ok or at least with later war planes like F6F and Corsair. 

Back to top
Contenu Sponsorisé






PostPosted: Today at 04:16 (2017)    Post subject: [Done] Early Year CAP Needs Improvement (v1.8)

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Carrier Battles for Guadalcanal Forum Index -> Topics -> New Features All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  

Index | Administration Panel | Create own nforum | Free support forum | Free forums directory | Report a violation | Conditions générales d'utilisation
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group