Carrier Battles for Guadalcanal Forum Index

Carrier Battles for Guadalcanal


 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Next Priority Surface Ships
Goto page: <  1, 2, 3, 4
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Carrier Battles for Guadalcanal Forum Index -> Topics -> New Features
Previous topic :: Next topic  
Author Message
larsenjp
Beta-testing

Offline

Joined: 19 Aug 2017
Posts: 415

PostPosted: Sat 6 Oct - 14:36 (2018)    Post subject: Next Priority Surface Ships Reply with quote

Regarding this problem about managing ships damages after surface battles, i would suggest the following rules:
- AA: i don't think such damages should force a ship to withdraw
- oil leaks; to be discussed but to this point i do not think this should force the ship to withdraw
- turrets: i think that one turret disabled should be OK but the ship should be forced to withdraw if more 2 or more turrets are disabled
- structural damages: the ship should be forced to withdraw, whatever the other damages
- propulsion damages: same, the ship should be forced to withdraw

Then i think that such ships should be put into a dedicated detached TF/TG together with some escorting ships (number to be defined but at least one or two depending on the number of damaged ships) and sent back rearwards, i.e. Rabaul for the Japanese and Espiritu Santo for the US/Allied.
Maybe using "black" TF should be a solution even if the player will totally lose control of the ships. Plus the fact that some ships should be repaired, especially the ones suffering propulsion damages since propulsion may be restored; in this case, forcing the ship to withdraw should be reconsidered...
My 2 cents as usual... Wink



 


Back to top
Publicité






PostPosted: Sat 6 Oct - 14:36 (2018)    Post subject: Publicité

PublicitéSupprimer les publicités ?
Back to top
Bladerunner
Administrateur

Offline

Joined: 25 Jan 2016
Posts: 1,147
Localisation: France

PostPosted: Mon 8 Oct - 22:25 (2018)    Post subject: Next Priority Surface Ships Reply with quote

This change may also be a good thing for the AI behavior preventing it to expose its damage ships 

We may try the mandatory withdraw if heavily damaged ships
Using the black mark on TF.


This black TF have the disadvantage to be completely escaping player’s control, they can’t merge and may be easy preys


Back to top
larsenjp
Beta-testing

Offline

Joined: 19 Aug 2017
Posts: 415

PostPosted: Tue 9 Oct - 19:47 (2018)    Post subject: Next Priority Surface Ships Reply with quote

Yes, fully agree, behavior of black TFs is sometimes strange but i think it is the best and simplest solution.
Maybe an option should be to improve the moves of these black TF by putting some basic rules on it e.g. general direction towards rear main bases (i.e. Rabaul or Espiritu Santo) but still preserving safety of the ships (i.e. no move towards an enemy TF).


Back to top
Contenu Sponsorisé






PostPosted: Today at 13:27 (2018)    Post subject: Next Priority Surface Ships

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Carrier Battles for Guadalcanal Forum Index -> Topics -> New Features All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page: <  1, 2, 3, 4
Page 4 of 4

 
Jump to:  

Index | Administration Panel | Create own nforum | Free support forum | Free forums directory | Report a violation | Conditions générales d'utilisation
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group